What is (not) wrong with scalar gravity?

DOI10.1016/j.shpsb.2007.09.001zbMath1223.83041arXivgr-qc/0611100WikidataQ62591176 ScholiaQ62591176MaRDI QIDQ643148

Domenico J. W. Giulini

Publication date: 27 October 2011

Published in: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Part B. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0611100

zbMATH Keywords

gravity; general relativity; special relativity

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

83A05: Special relativity

83D05: Relativistic gravitational theories other than Einstein's, including asymmetric field theories

Related Items

Space-time philosophy reconstructed \textit{via} massive Nordström scalar gravities? Laws \textit{vs.} geometry, conventionality, and underdetermination, Einstein’s “Prague Field Equation” of 1912: Another Perspective

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Einstein's impact on the physics of the twentieth century
• An alternative approach to the theory of gravitation
• Einstein, Nordström and the early demise of scalar, Lorentz-covariant theories of gravitation
• The attraction of gravitation: new studies in the history of general relativity
• Scalar Field Theory as a Theory of Gravitation. I
• A scalar theory of gravitation
• Brief Review of Lorentz-Covariant Scalar Theories of Gravitation
• Scalar Gravitation
• Classical Electrodynamics in Terms of Direct Interparticle Action