On adaptive procedures controlling the familywise error rate
From MaRDI portal
Publication:643374
DOI10.1016/j.jspi.2011.06.022zbMath1368.62219MaRDI QIDQ643374
Helmut Finner, Wenge Guo, Sanat Kumar Sarkar
Publication date: 28 October 2011
Published in: Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2011.06.022
62F03: Parametric hypothesis testing
62H15: Hypothesis testing in multivariate analysis
62F35: Robustness and adaptive procedures (parametric inference)
62J15: Paired and multiple comparisons; multiple testing
Related Items
On improving some adaptive BH procedures controlling the FDR under dependence, Adaptive FWER control procedure for grouped hypotheses, Dynamic adaptive multiple tests with finite sample FDR control, Controlling mixed directional false discovery rate in multidimensional decisions with applications to microarray studies, A powerful FDR control procedure for multiple hypotheses, Bonferroni-type Plug-in Procedure Controlling Generalized Familywise Error Rate
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- On methods controlling the false discovery rate
- Control of the false discovery rate under dependence using the bootstrap and subsampling
- An adaptive step-down procedure with proven FDR control under independence
- Some probability inequalities for ordered MTP\(_2\) random variables: a proof of the Simes conjecture
- Multiple hypotheses testing and expected number of type I errors
- False discovery and false nondiscovery rates in single-step multiple testing procedures
- Adaptive FDR control under independence and dependence
- Multiple Comparisons
- Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate
- A note on adaptive Bonferroni and Holm procedures under dependence
- A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance
- The Simes Method for Multiple Hypothesis Testing With Positively Dependent Test Statistics
- Controlling the Familywise Error Rate with Plug-in Estimator for the Proportion of True Null Hypotheses
- Strong Control, Conservative Point Estimation and Simultaneous Conservative Consistency of False Discovery Rates: A Unified Approach
- An improved Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance
- Association of Random Variables, with Applications
- Comments on: Control of the false discovery rate under dependence using the bootstrap and subsampling