Why quantum mechanics favors adynamical and acausal interpretations such as relational blockworld over backwardly causal and time-symmetric rivals
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:643484)
Recommendations
- Reconciling spacetime and the quantum: Relational blockworld and the quantum liar paradox
- Is retrocausal quantum mechanics consistent with special relativity?
- The relational blockworld interpretation of non-relativistic quantum mechanics
- Does time-symmetry imply retrocausality? How the quantum world says Maybe?
- Is a time symmetric interpretation of quantum theory possible without retrocausality?
Cites work
- Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3208040 (Why is no real title available?)
- Nonlocality for two particles without inequalities for almost all entangled states
- Quantum Chance and Non-locality
- Quantum phenomena within a new theory of time
- Reconciling spacetime and the quantum: Relational blockworld and the quantum liar paradox
- Revisiting Hardy's paradox: Counterfactual statements, real measurements, entanglement and weak values
- Time-symmetric quantum mechanics
- Time-symmetrised quantum theory, counterfactuals and `advanced action'
- Towards a local hidden variable theory
Cited in
(4)- Absorbers in the transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics
- Being, becoming and the undivided universe: a dialogue between relational blockworld and the implicate order concerning the unification of relativity and quantum theory
- The quantum liar experiment in Cramer's transactional interpretation
- Reconciling spacetime and the quantum: Relational blockworld and the quantum liar paradox
This page was built for publication: Why quantum mechanics favors adynamical and acausal interpretations such as relational blockworld over backwardly causal and time-symmetric rivals
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q643484)