Is there a reversibility paradox? Recentering the debate on the thermodynamic time arrow
DOI10.1016/J.SHPSB.2008.05.002zbMATH Open1223.82029OpenAlexW2026502780MaRDI QIDQ643499FDOQ643499
Authors: Alon Drory 
Publication date: 31 October 2011
Published in: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Part B. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2008.05.002
Recommendations
entropysecond law of thermodynamicsirreversibilityBoltzmannpast hypothesisreversibility objectiontime arrowtime asymmetry
Cites Work
- The ``past hypothesis: not even false
- The origins of time-asymmetry in thermodynamics: the minus first law
- Bluff your way in the second law of thermodynamics
- Time and chance
- An Alternative Approach to the Ergodic Problem
- Ergodic theory, interpretations of probability and the foundations of statistical mechanics
Cited In (11)
- Failure and uses of Jaynes' principle of transformation groups
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- On the Boltzmann-Grad limit for smooth hard-sphere systems
- What is the Problem about the Time‐Asymmetry of Thermodynamics?—A Reply to Price
- In search of time lost: asymmetry of time and irreversibility in natural processes
- Entropy and Eschatology: A Comment on Kutrovátz's Paper "Heat Death in Ancient and Modern Thermodynamics"
- Can the second law be compatible with time reversal invariant dynamics?
- Lanford's theorem and the emergence of irreversibility
- (Ir)reversibility and entropy
- Boltzmann's Time Bomb
- Macroscopic irreversibility and decay to kinetic equilibrium of the 1-body PDF for finite hard-sphere systems
This page was built for publication: Is there a reversibility paradox? Recentering the debate on the thermodynamic time arrow
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q643499)
