Chromatic number is not tournament-local

From MaRDI portal
Publication:6437889

arXiv2305.15585MaRDI QIDQ6437889FDOQ6437889


Authors: António Girão, Kevin Hendrey, Freddie Illingworth, Florian Lehner, Lukas Michel, Raphael Steiner Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 24 May 2023

Abstract: Scott and Seymour conjectured the existence of a function fcolonmathbbNomathbbN such that, for every graph G and tournament T on the same vertex set, chi(G)geqslantf(k) implies that chi(G[NT+(v)])geqslantk for some vertex v. In this note we disprove this conjecture even if v is replaced by a vertex set of size mathcalO(loglvertV(G)vert). As a consequence, we answer in the negative a question of Harutyunyan, Le, Thomass'{e}, and Wu concerning the corresponding statement where the graph G is replaced by another tournament, and disprove a related conjecture of Nguyen, Scott, and Seymour. We also show that the setting where chromatic number is replaced by degeneracy exhibits a quite different behaviour.













This page was built for publication: Chromatic number is not tournament-local

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6437889)