Comments on ``There is no axiomatic system for the quantum theory
From MaRDI portal
Publication:644355
DOI10.1007/S10773-011-0696-ZzbMATH Open1225.81003arXiv1204.6035OpenAlexW2132633895MaRDI QIDQ644355FDOQ644355
Authors: J. Acacio de Barros 
Publication date: 4 November 2011
Published in: International Journal of Theoretical Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Abstract: In a recent paper, Nagata [1] claims to derive inconsistencies from quantum mechanics. In this paper, we show that the inconsistencies do not come from quantum mechanics, but from extra assumptions about the reality of observables.
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1204.6035
Recommendations
- There is no axiomatic system for the quantum theory
- von Neumann standard quantum mechanics is logically inconsistent
- `Shut up and comtemplate': Lucien Hardy's reasonable axioms for quantum theory
- Orthogonality and orthocomplementations in the axiomatic approach to quantum mechanics: Remarks about some critiques
- Axiomatic foundations of quantum mechanics revisited: The case for systems
General and philosophical questions in quantum theory (81P05) Quantum measurement theory, state operations, state preparations (81P15)
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
- On the Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics
- Quantum theory: concepts and methods
- Quantum mechanics, interference, and the brain
- When are probabilistic explanations possible?
- The Quantum Theory of Motion
- There is no axiomatic system for the quantum theory
Cited In (4)
This page was built for publication: Comments on ``There is no axiomatic system for the quantum theory
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q644355)
