Comments on ``There is no axiomatic system for the quantum theory
From MaRDI portal
Publication:644355
Abstract: In a recent paper, Nagata [1] claims to derive inconsistencies from quantum mechanics. In this paper, we show that the inconsistencies do not come from quantum mechanics, but from extra assumptions about the reality of observables.
Recommendations
- There is no axiomatic system for the quantum theory
- von Neumann standard quantum mechanics is logically inconsistent
- `Shut up and comtemplate': Lucien Hardy's reasonable axioms for quantum theory
- Orthogonality and orthocomplementations in the axiomatic approach to quantum mechanics: Remarks about some critiques
- Axiomatic foundations of quantum mechanics revisited: The case for systems
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3213336 (Why is no real title available?)
- Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
- On the Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics
- Quantum mechanics, interference, and the brain
- Quantum theory: concepts and methods
- The Quantum Theory of Motion
- There is no axiomatic system for the quantum theory
- When are probabilistic explanations possible?
Cited in
(4)
This page was built for publication: Comments on ``There is no axiomatic system for the quantum theory
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q644355)