A Comparison of Information Concerning the Regression Parameter in The Accelerated Failure Time Model under Current Duration and Length Biased Sampling: Does it Pay to be Patient?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6476894
arXivmath/0603497MaRDI QIDQ6476894FDOQ6476894
Bert van Es, Chris A. J. Klaassen, Philip J. Mokveld
Publication date: 21 March 2006
Abstract: Longitudinal observations are sometimes costly or not available. Cross sectional sampling can be an alternative. Observations are drawn then at a specific point in time from a population of durations whose distributions satisfy a {em core model}. Subsequently, one has a choice. One may process the data immediately, obtaining so called current duration data. Or one waits until the sampled durations are known completely obtaining the full durations via length biased sampling. We compare the Fisher information for the Euclidean parameter corresponding to an Accelerated Failure Time core model when the observations are obtained by either current duration or length biased sampling.
This page was built for publication: A Comparison of Information Concerning the Regression Parameter in The Accelerated Failure Time Model under Current Duration and Length Biased Sampling: Does it Pay to be Patient?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6476894)
