The fractional version of Hedetniemi's conjecture is true

From MaRDI portal
Publication:648973

DOI10.1016/j.ejc.2011.03.004zbMath1229.05108OpenAlexW2004030389WikidataQ123205473 ScholiaQ123205473MaRDI QIDQ648973

Xuding Zhu

Publication date: 29 November 2011

Published in: European Journal of Combinatorics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejc.2011.03.004




Related Items (28)

Degree Ramsey Numbers of GraphsIn praise of homomorphismsOrthogonal graphs over finite commutative rings of odd characteristicThinness of product graphsThe fractional chromatic number of generalized cones over graphsShannon capacity and the categorical productSabidussi versus Hedetniemi for three variations of the chromatic numberDegree Ramsey numbers for even cyclesMaximum independent sets in direct products of cycles or trees with arbitrary graphsVector coloring the categorical product of graphsIndependent sets in direct products of vertex-transitive graphsTurán numbers of several bipartite graphsAltermatic number of categorical product of graphsOn 3-colorings of direct products of graphsRelatively small counterexamples to Hedetniemi's conjectureHedetniemi's conjecture is asymptotically falseFractional chromatic numbers of tensor products of three graphsIndependent sets in tensor products of three vertex-transitive graphsDegree bipartite Ramsey numbersCounterexamples to Hedetniemi's conjectureA note on Hedetniemi's conjecture, Stahl's conjecture and the Poljak-Rödl functionSymplectic graphs over finite commutative ringsOn the ultimate categorical independence ratioNote on Hedetniemi's conjecture and the Poljak-Rödl functionA note on the Poljak-Rödl functionCounterexamples to Hedetniemi's conjecture with large fractional chromatic numbersOn maximum independent set of categorical product and ultimate categorical ratios of graphsCounterexamples to Hedetniemi's conjecture and infinite Boolean lattices



Cites Work


This page was built for publication: The fractional version of Hedetniemi's conjecture is true