On acceptance conditions in abstract argumentation frameworks
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:6494661)
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1158762 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 839556 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6747882 (Why is no real title available?)
- A novel weighted defence and its relaxation in abstract argumentation
- A three-valued semantics for querying and repairing inconsistent databases
- Analyzing the computational complexity of abstract dialectical frameworks via approximation fixpoint theory
- Case-based strategies for argumentation dialogues in agent societies
- Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach
- Extrema predicates in deductive databases
- Greedy algorithms in Datalog
- Higher-order interactions (bipolar or not) in abstract argumentation: a state of the art
- Incremental computation for structured argumentation over dynamic DeLP knowledge bases
- Monotonic aggregation in deductive databases
- Multi-shot ASP solving with clingo
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
- On the correctness of unfold/fold transformation of normal and extended logic programs
- On the equivalence between logic programming semantics and argumentation semantics
- On the semantics of abstract argumentation frameworks: a logic programming approach
- Optimization of bound disjunctive queries with constraints
- Proximity semantics for topic-based abstract argumentation
- Solving Advanced Argumentation Problems with Answer Set Programming
- The expressive powers of stable models for bound and unbound DATALOG queries
- Unfolding partiality and disjunctions in stable model semantics
- Using arguments for making and explaining decisions
- Vicious circle principle, aggregates, and formation of sets in ASP based languages
- Well-founded and stable semantics of logic programs with aggregates
- Well-foundedness in weighted argumentation frameworks
Cited in
(3)
This page was built for publication: On acceptance conditions in abstract argumentation frameworks
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6494661)