Emergence, reduction and supervenience: a varied landscape

From MaRDI portal
Publication:649890

DOI10.1007/S10701-011-9549-0zbMATH Open1226.00035arXiv1106.0704OpenAlexW2108592764MaRDI QIDQ649890FDOQ649890


Authors: Juan-Miguel Gracia Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 25 November 2011

Published in: Foundations of Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: This is one of two papers about emergence, reduction and supervenience. It expounds these notions and analyses the general relations between them. The companion paper analyses the situation in physics, especially limiting relations between physical theories. I shall take emergence as behaviour that is novel and robust relative to some comparison class. I shall take reduction as deduction using appropriate auxiliary definitions. And I shall take supervenience as a weakening of reduction, viz. to allow infinitely long definitions. The overall claim of this paper will be that emergence is logically independent both of reduction and of supervenience. In particular, one can have emergence with reduction, as well as without it; and emergence without supervenience, as well as with it. Of the subsidiary claims, the four main ones (each shared with some other authors) are: (i): I defend the traditional Nagelian conception of reduction (Section 3); (ii): I deny that the multiple realizability argument causes trouble for reductions, or "reductionism" (Section 4); (iii): I stress the collapse of supervenience into deduction via Beth's theorem (Section 5.1); (iv): I adapt some examples already in the literature to show supervenience without emergence and vice versa (Section 5.2).


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1106.0704




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (37)





This page was built for publication: Emergence, reduction and supervenience: a varied landscape

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q649890)