Observers and locality in Everett quantum field theory

DOI10.1007/S10701-011-9543-6zbMATH Open1226.81015OpenAlexW2037492576MaRDI QIDQ649899FDOQ649899

Authors Mark A. Rubin 

Publication date 25 November 2011

Published in Foundations of Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://arxiv.org/abs/0909.2673

zbMATH Keywords

quantum field theorylocalityEverett interpretationDeutsch-Hayden pictureEinstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiment

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

General and philosophical questions in quantum theory (81P05) Model quantum field theories (81T10)

Abstract: A model for measurement in collapse-free nonrelativistic fermionic quantum field theory is presented. In addition to local propagation and effectively-local interactions, the model incorporates explicit representations of localized observers, thus extending an earlier model of entanglement generation in Everett quantum field theory [M. A. Rubin, Found. Phys. 32, 1495-1523 (2002)]. Transformations of the field operators from the Heisenberg picture to the Deutsch-Hayden picture, involving fictitious auxiliary fields, establish the locality of the model. The model is applied to manifestly-local calculations of the results of measurements, using a type of sudden approximation and in the limit of massive systems in narrow-wavepacket states. Detection of the presence of a spin-1/2 system in a given spin state by a freely-moving two-state observer illustrates the features of the model and the nonperturbative computational methodology. With the help of perturbation theory the model is applied to a calculation of the quintessential "nonlocal" quantum phenomenon, spin correlations in the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm experiment.

Recommendations

• The measurement process in local quantum physics and the EPR paradox
• Collapse and relativity
• Spin correlations in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics
• Spatial degrees of freedom in Everett quantum mechanics
• On spontaneous wave function collapse and quantum field theory

Cites Work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5901900 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 41874 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4003018 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4003342 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2102224 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3075634 (Why is no real title available?)
• A unification of chirality measures
• An introduction to many worlds in quantum computation
• Bell’s theorem without inequalities
• Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
• Classicality, the ensemble interpretation, and decoherence: Resolving the hyperion dispute
• Decoherent Histories and the Emergent Classicality of Local Densities
• In defence of naiveté: the conceptual status of Lagrangian quantum field theory
• Information flow in entangled quantum systems
• Mapping of composite hadrons into elementary hadrons and effective hadronic Hamiltonians
• Nonlocality and information flow: the approach of Deutsch and Hayden
• On schizophrenic experiences of the neutron or why we should believe in the many‐worlds interpretation of quantum theory
• Scattering Involving a Bound State
• Spatial degrees of freedom in Everett quantum mechanics
• Strict Localization in Quantum Field Theory
• The structure of the multiverse
• There is no basis ambiguity in Everett quantum mechanics
• Violation of Bell's Inequality under Strict Einstein Locality Conditions

Cited In (4)

• Observers, observables, spinors, and the confusion of tongues
• Vindication of quantum locality
• On the Existence of a Kazantzis--Kravaris/Luenberger Observer
• Inferring effective field observables from a discrete model

This page was built for publication: Observers and locality in Everett quantum field theory

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q649899)