Regularization of Inverse Problems: Deep Equilibrium Models versus Bilevel Learning

DOI10.3934/NACO.2023026arXiv2206.13193MaRDI QIDQ6506161FDOQ6506161

Authors: Danilo Riccio, Matthias J. Ehrhardt, Martin Benning 

Abstract: Variational regularization methods are commonly used to approximate solutions of inverse problems. In recent years, model-based variational regularization methods have often been replaced with data-driven ones such as the fields-of-expert model (Roth and Black, 2009). Training the parameters of such data-driven methods can be formulated as a bilevel optimization problem. In this paper, we compare the framework of bilevel learning for the training of data-driven variational regularization models with the novel framework of deep equilibrium models (Bai, Kolter, and Koltun, 2019) that has recently been introduced in the context of inverse problems (Gilton, Ongie, and Willett, 2021). We show that computing the lower-level optimization problem within the bilevel formulation with a fixed point iteration is a special case of the deep equilibrium framework. We compare both approaches computationally, with a variety of numerical examples for the inverse problems of denoising, inpainting and deconvolution.

This page was built for publication: Regularization of Inverse Problems: Deep Equilibrium Models versus Bilevel Learning

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6506161)