Boltzmann's H-theorem, its discontents, and the birth of statistical mechanics

From MaRDI portal
Publication:652785

DOI10.1016/J.SHPSB.2009.03.003zbMATH Open1228.82052arXiv0809.1304OpenAlexW2108797601MaRDI QIDQ652785FDOQ652785


Authors: Jos Uffink, Harvey R. Brown, Wayne C. Myrvold Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 17 December 2011

Published in: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Part B. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: A comparison is made of the traditional Loschmidt (reversibility) and Zermelo (recurrence) objections to Boltzmann's H-theorem, and its simplified variant in the Ehrenfests' 1912 wind-tree model. The little-cited 1896 (pre-recurrence) objection of Zermelo (similar to an 1889 argument due to Poincare) is also analysed. Significant differences between the objections are highlighted, and several old and modern misconceptions concerning both them and the H-theorem are clarified. We give particular emphasis to the radical nature of Poincare's and Zermelo's attack, and the importance of the shift in Boltzmann's thinking in response to the objections as a whole.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/0809.1304




Recommendations



Cites Work


Cited In (19)





This page was built for publication: Boltzmann's H-theorem, its discontents, and the birth of statistical mechanics

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q652785)