Boltzmann's H-theorem, its discontents, and the birth of statistical mechanics

DOI10.1016/J.SHPSB.2009.03.003MaRDI QIDQ652785zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Jos Uffink, Harvey R. Brown, Wayne C. Myrvold

Publication date 17 December 2011

Published in Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Part B. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://arxiv.org/abs/0809.1304

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

History of mathematics in the 19th century (01A55) History of statistical mechanics (82-03) Foundations of time-dependent statistical mechanics (82C03)

Abstract: A comparison is made of the traditional Loschmidt (reversibility) and Zermelo (recurrence) objections to Boltzmann's H-theorem, and its simplified variant in the Ehrenfests' 1912 wind-tree model. The little-cited 1896 (pre-recurrence) objection of Zermelo (similar to an 1889 argument due to Poincare) is also analysed. Significant differences between the objections are highlighted, and several old and modern misconceptions concerning both them and the H-theorem are clarified. We give particular emphasis to the radical nature of Poincare's and Zermelo's attack, and the importance of the shift in Boltzmann's thinking in response to the objections as a whole.

Recommendations

• In praise of Clausius entropy: reassessing the foundations of Boltzmannian statistical mechanics
• Boltzmann-Loschmidt-Zermelo versus Poincaré -- is there any recurrence?
• The nineteenth century conflict between mechanism and irreversibility
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3148320
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1067780

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1619363 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1807376 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3181013 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1825533 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3057307 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3093363 (Why is no real title available?)
• Boltzmann and Gibbs: an attempted reconciliation
• Entropy and time
• Foundations of Statistical Mechanics
• Probability, arrow of time and decoherence
• The ``past hypothesis: not even false
• The problem of time's arrow historico-critically reexamined
• Time and chance

Cited in

(19)

• Boltzmann-Loschmidt-Zermelo versus Poincaré -- is there any recurrence?
• Stochastic entropy production in diffusive systems
• The nineteenth century conflict between mechanism and irreversibility
• Memory, the fork asymmetry, and the initial state
• Statistical mechanics and thermodynamics: a Maxwellian view
• Laws of nature as constraints
• Irreversibility in the derivation of the Boltzmann equation
• Recurrence theorems: A unified account
• In search of time lost: asymmetry of time and irreversibility in natural processes
• In praise of Clausius entropy: reassessing the foundations of Boltzmannian statistical mechanics
• Smooth crossover between weak and strong thermalization using rigorous bounds on equilibration of isolated systems
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1425654 (Why is no real title available?)
• The quantitative content of statistical mechanics
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 878359 (Why is no real title available?)
• Confusion and clarification: Albert Einstein and Walther Nernst's heat theorem, 1911-1916
• Thermodynamic limit in statistical physics
• Boltzmann and Gibbs: an attempted reconciliation
• Talk about toy models
• The Ehrenfests' use of toy models to explore irreversibility in statistical mechanics

This page was built for publication: Boltzmann's H-theorem, its discontents, and the birth of statistical mechanics

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q652785)