Not each sequential effect algebra is sharply dominating
From MaRDI portal
Publication:653090
DOI10.1016/J.PHYSLETA.2009.02.073zbMATH Open1229.81022arXiv0812.2502OpenAlexW2962744501MaRDI QIDQ653090FDOQ653090
Publication date: 6 January 2012
Published in: Physics Letters. A (Search for Journal in Brave)
Abstract: Let be an effect algebra and be the set of all sharp elements of . is said to be sharply dominating if for each there exists a smallest element such that . In 2002, Professors Gudder and Greechie proved that each -sequential effect algebra is sharply dominating. In 2005, Professor Gudder presented 25 open problems in International Journal of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 44, 2199-2205, the 3th problem asked: Is each sequential effect algebra sharply dominating? Now, we construct an example to answer the problem negatively.
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/0812.2502
Recommendations
Quantum logic (03G12) Logical foundations of quantum mechanics; quantum logic (quantum-theoretic aspects) (81P10) Complemented lattices, orthocomplemented lattices and posets (06C15)
Cites Work
Cited In (7)
- Remarks on the sequential effect algebras
- Some problems for sequential effect algebras
- A universal property for sequential measurement
- Continuity of the sequential product of sequential quantum effect algebras
- Remarks on entropy of partition on the sequential effect algebras
- Uniformly Archimedean atomic MV-effect algebra is sharply dominating
- The average value inequality in sequential effect algebras
This page was built for publication: Not each sequential effect algebra is sharply dominating
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q653090)