Transitivity vs. Intransitivity in decision making process - an example in quantum game theory
DOI10.1016/J.PHYSLETA.2009.04.028zbMATH Open1229.81052arXiv0901.1603OpenAlexW1987417068MaRDI QIDQ653169FDOQ653169
Authors: Marcin Makowski
Publication date: 6 January 2012
Published in: Physics Letters. A (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/0901.1603
Recommendations
Problem solving in the context of artificial intelligence (heuristics, search strategies, etc.) (68T20) Quantum information, communication, networks (quantum-theoretic aspects) (81P45) Multistage and repeated games (91A20) General topics in artificial intelligence (68T01)
Cites Work
- Social choice and individual values
- An invitation to quantum game theory
- Quantum Games and Quantum Strategies
- Entanglement and dynamic stability of Nash equilibria in a symmetric quantum game
- Darwinism in quantum systems?
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Nontransitive preferences in decision theory
- Quantum dynamics of human decision-making
- Geometry. I, II. Transl. from the French by M. Cole and S. Levy
- Quantization of games: towards quantum artificial intelligence
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
Cited In (7)
- Preferences in quantum games
- Quantum Barro-Gordon game in monetary economics
- Do transitive preferences always result in indifferent divisions?
- Betting on dynamics
- When \textit{I cut, you choose} method implies intransitivity
- Decisions in elections-transitive or intransitive quantum preferences
- Quantization and experimental realization of the Colonel Blotto game
This page was built for publication: Transitivity vs. Intransitivity in decision making process - an example in quantum game theory
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q653169)