A comparison of a traditional geostatistical regression approach and a general Gaussian process approach for spatial prediction

DOI10.1002/STA4.57MaRDI QIDQ6537795FDOQ6537795

Authors: Stanley Leung, Daniel Cooley 

Publication date: 14 May 2024

Published in: Stat (Search for Journal in Brave)

zbMATH Keywords

machine learningkrigingsoil moisturenon-stationary spatial models

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Statistics (62-XX)

Cites Work

• Strictly Proper Scoring Rules, Prediction, and Estimation
• Statistical Methods for Spatial Data Analysis
• Inconsistent Estimation and Asymptotically Equal Interpolations in Model-Based Geostatistics
• Model-based geostatistics.
• Bayesian Spatial Modeling of Extreme Precipitation Return Levels
• Multiresolution models for nonstationary spatial covariance functions
• Spectral methods for nonstationary spatial processes
• Space and space-time modeling using process convolutions
• A class of covariate-dependent spatiotemporal covariance functions for the analysis of daily ozone concentration

Cited In (1)

• On selection of semiparametric spatial regression models

This page was built for publication: A comparison of a traditional geostatistical regression approach and a general Gaussian process approach for spatial prediction

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6537795)