Are upwind techniques in multi-phase flow models necessary?

DOI10.1016/J.JCP.2011.07.030MaRDI QIDQ654159zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Juan-Miguel Gracia

Publication date 28 December 2011

Published in Journal of Computational Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2011.07.030

zbMATH Keywords

two-phase flowGalerkin finite element methodsupwind schemes

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Finite element, Rayleigh-Ritz and Galerkin methods for initial value and initial-boundary value problems involving PDEs (65M60) Finite element methods applied to problems in fluid mechanics (76M10) Multiphase and multicomponent flows (76T99)

Recommendations

• Numerical treatment of two-phase flow in capillary heterogeneous porous media by finite-volume approximations
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3850749
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1819831
• Multidimensional upwind schemes and higher resolution methods for three-component two-phase systems including gravity driven flow in porous media on unstructured grids
• Upscaled modeling in multiphase flow applications

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2087097 (Why is no real title available?)
• A finite element analysis of multiphase immiscible flow in deforming porous media for subsurface systems
• Finite element analysis of non-isothermal multiphase geomaterials with application to strain localization simulation

Cited in

(2)

• An efficient finite element procedure for analyzing three-phase porous media based on the relaxed Picard method
• Reactive transport codes for subsurface environmental simulation

Describes a project that uses

Uses Software

• TOUGH
• PARDISO

This page was built for publication: Are upwind techniques in multi-phase flow models necessary?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q654159)