Using cross-validation methods to select time series models: promises and pitfalls
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6559931
Recommendations
- A note on the validity of cross-validation for evaluating autoregressive time series prediction
- The lack of cross-validation can lead to inflated results and spurious conclusions: a re-analysis of the MacArthur violence risk assessment study
- A systematic study into the factors that affect the predictive accuracy of multilevel VAR(1) models
- Time series cross validation: a theoretical result and finite sample performance
- Multiple predicting K-fold cross-validation for model selection
Cites work
- A new look at the statistical model identification
- A new method of the description of the information flow in the brain structures
- A systematic study into the factors that affect the predictive accuracy of multilevel VAR(1) models
- An introduction to statistical learning. With applications in R
- An investigation of model selection criteria for neural network time series forecasting
- Cross-Validation: What Does It Estimate and How Well Does It Do It?
- Estimating the dimension of a model
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 48701 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3553528 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1034037 (Why is no real title available?)
- New introduction to multiple time series analysis.
- Penalized Estimation and Forecasting of Multiple Subject Intensive Longitudinal Data
- Person-specific versus multilevel autoregressive models: accuracy in parameter estimates at the population and individual levels
- The Elements of Statistical Learning
- The Predictive Sample Reuse Method with Applications
- To explain or to predict?
Cited in
(3)
This page was built for publication: Using cross-validation methods to select time series models: promises and pitfalls
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6559931)