On the cost of post-compromise security in concurrent continuous group-key agreement

DOI10.1007/978-3-031-48621-0_10MaRDI QIDQ6582220zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Benedikt Auerbach, Miguel Cueto Noval, Guillermo Pascual-Perez, Krzysztof Pietrzak

Publication date 2 August 2024

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48621-0_10

zbMATH Keywords

forward secrecypost-compromise securityTreeKEM

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Data encryption (aspects in computer science) (68P25) Cryptography (94A60) Authentication, digital signatures and secret sharing (94A62)

Recommendations

• CoCoA: concurrent continuous group key agreement
• On the worst-case inefficiency of CGKA
• DeCAF: Decentralizable CGKA with fast healing
• Multicast key agreement, revisited
• Continuous group key agreement with active security

Cites work

• A unified and composable take on ratcheting
• Advances in Cryptology - EUROCRYPT 2004
• CoCoA: concurrent continuous group key agreement
• Continuous group key agreement with active security
• Grafting key trees: efficient key management for overlapping groups
• On the insider security of MLS
• On the price of concurrency in group ratcheting protocols
• On the security of public key protocols
• On the worst-case inefficiency of CGKA
• Security analysis and improvements for the IETF MLS standard for group messaging

Cited in

(6)

• Continuous group key agreement with active security
• DeCAF: Decentralizable CGKA with fast healing
• Continuous group-key agreement: concurrent updates without pruning
• GURKE: group unidirectional ratcheted key exchange
• Succinct PPRFs via memory-tight reductions
• The cost of maintaining keys in dynamic groups with applications to multicast encryption and group messaging

This page was built for publication: On the cost of post-compromise security in concurrent continuous group-key agreement

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6582220)