Contribution functions for quantitative bipolar argumentation graphs: a principle-based analysis

DOI10.1016/J.IJAR.2024.109255MaRDI QIDQ6596710zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Timotheus Kampik, Nico Potyka, Xiang Yin, Kristijonas Čyras, Francesca Toni

Publication date 2 September 2024

Published in International Journal of Approximate Reasoning (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJAR.2024.109255

zbMATH Keywords

automated reasoningquantitative argumentationexplainable AI

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Logic in artificial intelligence (68T27)

Recommendations

• Evaluation of arguments in weighted bipolar graphs
• A principle-based analysis of bipolar argumentation semantics
• Evaluation of arguments in weighted bipolar graphs
• From fine-grained properties to broad principles for gradual argumentation: a principled spectrum
• Measuring disagreement in argumentation graphs

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7582523 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3078997 (Why is no real title available?)
• Advancing mathematics by guiding human intuition with AI
• Argumentative explanations for interactive recommendations
• Change in quantitative bipolar argumentation: sufficient, necessary, and counterfactual explanations
• Evaluation of argument strength in attack graphs: foundations and semantics
• Evaluation of arguments in weighted bipolar graphs
• From fine-grained properties to broad principles for gradual argumentation: a principled spectrum
• Interpretability of gradual semantics in abstract argumentation

This page was built for publication: Contribution functions for quantitative bipolar argumentation graphs: a principle-based analysis

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6596710)