On set consensus numbers
From MaRDI portal
Publication:661057
DOI10.1007/s00446-011-0142-8zbMath1231.68075OpenAlexW2049110438MaRDI QIDQ661057
Publication date: 6 February 2012
Published in: Distributed Computing (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00446-011-0142-8
Related Items (5)
Partial synchrony based on set timeliness ⋮ Renaming and the weakest family of failure detectors ⋮ Generalized Symmetry Breaking Tasks and Nondeterminism in Concurrent Objects ⋮ Wait-freedom with advice ⋮ Simultaneous Consensus vs Set Agreement: A Message-Passing-Sensitive Hierarchy of Agreement Problems
Cites Work
- The disagreement power of an adversary
- Anti-\(\Omega \): the weakest failure detector for set agreement
- More \(choices\) allow more \(faults\): Set consensus problems in totally asynchronous systems
- Failure detectors as type boosters
- Every problem has a weakest failure detector
- The topological structure of asynchronous computability
- Automatic Classification of Eventual Failure Detectors
- Tight failure detection bounds on atomic object implementations
- The Disagreement Power of an Adversary
- On Set Consensus Numbers
- Time, clocks, and the ordering of events in a distributed system
- Unreliable failure detectors for reliable distributed systems
- The weakest failure detector for solving consensus
- Wait-Free k-Set Agreement is Impossible: The Topology of Public Knowledge
- The weakest failure detector for solving k-set agreement
- Generalized FLP impossibility result for t-resilient asynchronous computations
- Wait-free k-set agreement is impossible
- The asynchronous computability theorem for t-resilient tasks
- Randomized wait-free concurrent objects (extended abstract)
This page was built for publication: On set consensus numbers