Estimation of diagnostic test accuracy: a ``rule of three for data with repeated observations but without a gold standard
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6627981
DOI10.1002/SIM.9097zbMATH Open1546.6278MaRDI QIDQ6627981FDOQ6627981
Publication date: 29 October 2024
Published in: Statistics in Medicine (Search for Journal in Brave)
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Estimating the Error Rates of Diagnostic Tests
- Latent Variable Modeling of Diagnostic Accuracy
- Latent Class Model Diagnosis
- Identifiability of Models for Multiple Diagnostic Testing in the Absence of a Gold Standard
- On model expansion, model contraction, identifiability and prior information: two illustrative scenarios involving mismeasured variables
- A Cautionary Note on the Robustness of Latent Class Models for Estimating Diagnostic Error without a Gold Standard
- Insights into latent class analysis of diagnostic test performance
- Evaluation of the accuracy of diagnostic tests from repeated~measurements~without a~gold~standard
- Bayesian Meta‐Analysis of the Accuracy of a Test for Tuberculous Pleuritis in the Absence of a Gold Standard Reference
- Estimates of Sensitivity and Specificity in a Multistage Screen for Medical Diagnosis
- Estimation of sensitivity and specificity of multiple repeated binary tests without a gold standard
This page was built for publication: Estimation of diagnostic test accuracy: a ``rule of three for data with repeated observations but without a gold standard
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6627981)