How vague is vague? How informative is informative? Reference analysis for Bayesian meta-analysis
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6628486
DOI10.1002/SIM.9076zbMATH Open1546.62573MaRDI QIDQ6628486FDOQ6628486
Authors: Manuela Ott, Martyn Plummer, Małgorzata Roos 
Publication date: 29 October 2024
Published in: Statistics in Medicine (Search for Journal in Brave)
reference analysisBayesian meta-analysisnormal-normal hierarchical modelconservative/anticonservative heterogeneity priorsprior informativeness quantification
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models (Comment on article by Browne and Draper)
- Asymptotic methods in statistical decision theory
- The Selection of Prior Distributions by Formal Rules
- Prior distributions for objective Bayesian analysis
- The BUGS book. A practical introduction to Bayesian analysis
- The formal definition of reference priors
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Sensitivity analysis for Bayesian hierarchical models
- Nonparametric density estimation with a parametric start
- Bayesian methods in meta-analysis and evidence synthesis
- Objective Bayesian inference for a generalized marginal random effects model
- A Bayesian Approach to Ranking and Selection of Related Means With Alternatives to Analysis-of-Variance Methodology
- Conservative prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Meta-analysis of two studies in the presence of heterogeneity with applications in rare diseases
Cited In (2)
This page was built for publication: How vague is vague? How informative is informative? Reference analysis for Bayesian meta-analysis
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6628486)
