Comments on “Unobservable Selection and Coefficient Stability: Theory and Evidence” and “Poorly Measured Confounders are More Useful on the Left Than on the Right”
From MaRDI portal
Publication:6634855
DOI10.1080/07350015.2019.1575743zbMATH Open1548.62557MaRDI QIDQ6634855FDOQ6634855
Authors: Giuseppe de~Luca, Jan R. Magnus, Franco Peracchi
Publication date: 8 November 2024
Published in: Journal of Business and Economic Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Valid post-selection inference
- Partial identification of probability distributions.
- On various confidence intervals post-model-selection
- A Remark on Hausman's Specification Test
- The Use of Proxy Variables when One or Two Independent Variables are Measured with Error
- A Test of the Mean Square Error Criterion for Restrictions in Linear Regression
- Extending the Classical Normal Errors-in-Variables Model
- A weight-relaxed model averaging approach for high-dimensional generalized linear models
- Unobservable Selection and Coefficient Stability: Theory and Evidence
- Poorly Measured Confounders are More Useful on the Left than on the Right
This page was built for publication: Comments on “Unobservable Selection and Coefficient Stability: Theory and Evidence” and “Poorly Measured Confounders are More Useful on the Left Than on the Right”
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6634855)