On the accuracy in errors-in-variables identification compared to prediction-error identification
From MaRDI portal
Publication:665203
DOI10.1016/j.automatica.2011.09.002zbMath1235.93072OpenAlexW2052856927MaRDI QIDQ665203
Cristian R. Rojas, Jonas Mårtensson, Håkan Hjalmarsson, Torsten Söderström
Publication date: 5 March 2012
Published in: Automatica (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2011.09.002
system identificationaccuracy of identificationasymptotic variance expressionserror-in-variables identification
Related Items (5)
Finite model order accuracy in Hammerstein model estimation ⋮ Noise covariance estimation via autocovariance least-squares with deadbeat filters ⋮ A numerical investigation of direct and indirect closed-loop architectures for estimating nonminimum-phase zeros ⋮ Covariance analysis in SISO linear systems identification ⋮ Recursive least squares estimation algorithm applied to a class of linear-in-parameters output error moving average systems
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- On covariance function tests used in system identification
- Uncertainty of transfer function modelling using prior estimated noise models
- The Cramér--Rao lower bound for noisy input--output systems.
- A generalization of Whittle's formula for the information matrix of vector-mixed time series
- From experiment design to closed-loop control
- Discrete-time stochastic systems. Estimation and control.
- Estimation of model quality
- Identifiability of errors in variables dynamic systems
- On the frequency domain accuracy of closed-loop estimates
- A Geometric Approach to Variance Analysis in System Identification
- Errors-in-variables methods in system identification
- Asymptotic variance expressions for closed-loop identification
This page was built for publication: On the accuracy in errors-in-variables identification compared to prediction-error identification