Reconstruction methods for AHP pairwise matrices: how reliable are they?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:671103
DOI10.1016/j.amc.2016.01.008zbMath1410.91171OpenAlexW2474241334MaRDI QIDQ671103
Leonardo Wanderer, Marcelo Karanik, Jose Antonio Gomez-Ruiz, José Ignacio Peláez
Publication date: 20 March 2019
Published in: Applied Mathematics and Computation (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2016.01.008
decision support systemsAHPgenetic algorithmsfirefly algorithmpairwise matrix reconstruction methodsranking comparison
Related Items (1)
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Notes on order preservation and consistency in AHP
- Engineering optimisation by cuckoo search
- Backpropagation multi-layer perceptron for incomplete pairwise comparison matrices in analytic hierarchy process
- How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process
- Estimation of missing judgments in AHP pairwise matrices using a neural network-based model
- Procedures for synthesizing ratio judgements
- Artificial neural network representations for hierarchical preference structures
- Business process reengineering for health-care system using multicriteria mathematical programming
- Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary
- A new measure of consistency for positive reciprocal matrices
- A critical analysis of the eigenvalue method used to derive priorities in AHP
- Alternative modes of questioning in the analytic hierarchy process
- Decision Support Systems
- Firefly Algorithms for Multimodal Optimization
- Axiomatic Foundation of the Analytic Hierarchy Process
- PROPERTIES OF A POSITIVE RECIPROCAL MATRIX AND THEIR APPLICATION TO AHP
- A METHOD FOR IMPROVING THE CONSISTENCY OF JUDGEMENTS
- Practical Genetic Algorithms
- Introduction to Genetic Algorithms
This page was built for publication: Reconstruction methods for AHP pairwise matrices: how reliable are they?
