Linear interval equations: Computing enclosures with bounded relative or absolute overestimation is NP-hard
From MaRDI portal
Publication:676167
DOI10.1007/BF02389894zbMATH Open0871.65022MaRDI QIDQ676167FDOQ676167
Authors: Vladik Kreinovich, A. V. Lakeyev
Publication date: 1 October 1997
Published in: Reliable Computing (Search for Journal in Brave)
Recommendations
Complexity and performance of numerical algorithms (65Y20) Iterative numerical methods for linear systems (65F10) Interval and finite arithmetic (65G30)
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Interval Methods for Systems of Equations
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Interval linear systems with symmetric matrices, skew-symmetric matrices and dependencies in the right hand side
- Computing Exact Componentwise Bounds on Solutions of Lineary Systems with Interval Data is NP-Hard
- On the Symmetric and Unsymmetric Solution Set of Interval Systems
- Approximate linear algebra is intractable
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
Cited In (5)
- Solving linear interval systems is NP-hard even if we exclude overflow and underflow
- Interval mathematics, algebraic equations and optimization
- Enclosing solutions of linear interval equations is NP-hard
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Calculation of exact bounds for the solution set of linear interval systems
This page was built for publication: Linear interval equations: Computing enclosures with bounded relative or absolute overestimation is NP-hard
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q676167)