Exponentiating Higgs
From MaRDI portal
Publication:681387
DOI10.1016/J.PHYSLETB.2017.07.004zbMATH Open1379.81080arXiv1506.05761OpenAlexW3037459470MaRDI QIDQ681387FDOQ681387
Authors: Marco Matone
Publication date: 30 January 2018
Published in: Physics Letters B (Search for Journal in Brave)
Abstract: We consider two related formulations for mass generation in the Higgs-Kibble model and in the Standard Model (SM). In the first model there are no scalar self-interactions and, in the case of the SM, the formulation is related to the normal subgroup of , generated by , that acts trivially on all the fields of the SM. The key step of our construction is to relax the non-negative definiteness condition for the Higgs field due to the polar decomposition. This solves several stringent problems, that we will shortly review, both in the perturbative and non-perturbative formulations. We will show that the usual polar decomposition of the complex scalar doublet should be done with , where is the group generated by , and with the Higgs field rather than . As a byproduct, the investigation shows how Elitzur theorem may be avoided in the usual formulation of the SM. It follows that the simplest lagrangian density for the Higgs mechanism has the standard kinetic term in addition to the mass term, with the right sign, and to a linear term in . The other model concerns the scalar theories with normal ordered exponential interactions. The remarkable property of these theories is that for the purely scalar sector corresponds to a free theory.
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.05761
Recommendations
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Dual representation for the generating functional of the Feynman path-integral
- Some results for the exponential interaction in two or more dimensions
- Line operators in the standard model
- On the trail of the Higgs boson
- symmetry of the BKT transition and twisted boundary condition
- Symmetry breaking.
- \(Z_2\) monopoles, vortices and the universality of the SU(2) deconfinement transition
Cited In (1)
This page was built for publication: Exponentiating Higgs
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q681387)