Suslin's hypothesis does not imply stationary antichains

DOI10.1016/0168-0072(93)90032-9zbMATH Open0805.03037OpenAlexW2076880321MaRDI QIDQ688435FDOQ688435

Authors: Chaz Schlindwein 

Publication date: 5 February 1995

Published in: Annals of Pure and Applied Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-0072(93)90032-9

Recommendations

• SH plus CH does not imply stationary antichains.
• Consistency of Suslin's hypothesis, a nonspecial Aronszajn tree, and GCH
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 78011
• The consistency and independence of Suslin's hypothesis
• P-ideal dichotomy and a strong form of the Suslin hypothesis

zbMATH Keywords

Aronszajn treecountable support forcing iterationSuslin's hypothesis

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Other combinatorial set theory (03E05) Other aspects of forcing and Boolean-valued models (03E40)

Cites Work

• Set theory. An introduction to independence proofs
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Proper forcing
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Embedding Trees in the Rationals
• Consistency of Suslin's hypothesis, a nonspecial Aronszajn tree, and GCH
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Adding a closed unbounded set
• Multiple forcing

Cited In (9)

• P-ideal dichotomy and a strong form of the Suslin hypothesis
• Chain conditions in maximal models
• The consistency and independence of Suslin's hypothesis
• SH plus CH does not imply stationary antichains.
• Full Souslin trees at small cardinals
• A forcing axiom for a non-special Aronszajn tree
• Understanding preservation theorems: Chapter VI of \textit{Proper and improper forcing}. I
• \(\clubsuit\) does not imply the existence of a Suslin tree
• Antidiamond principles and topological applications

This page was built for publication: Suslin's hypothesis does not imply stationary antichains

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q688435)