Tolerance and mixed consequence in the S'valuationist setting

DOI10.1007/s11225-012-9422-yzbMath1260.03058OpenAlexW2115752650MaRDI QIDQ692200

Robert van Rooij, Pablo Cobreros, David Ripley, Paul Égré

Publication date: 4 December 2012

Published in: Studia Logica (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-012-9422-y

zbMATH Keywords

tolerancelogical consequencevaguenesssuper- and sub-valuationism

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Logic of natural languages (03B65)

Related Items

Vagueness: Why do we believe in tolerance?, Foreword: Three-valued logics and their applications, The (Greatest) Fragment of Classical Logic that Respects the Variable-Sharing Principle (in the FMLA-FMLA Framework), Supervaluations and the strict-tolerant hierarchy, Derivability and metainferential validity, Inferential constants, Pragmatic interpretations of vague expressions: strongest meaning and nonmonotonic consequence, SUSZKO’S PROBLEM: MIXED CONSEQUENCE AND COMPOSITIONALITY, A hierarchy of classical and paraconsistent logics, Meaningless divisions, Metainferential duality, The logics of strict-tolerant logic

Cites Work

• Tolerant, classical, strict
• A model of tolerance
• Vagueness, truth and logic
• Some supervaluation-based consequence relations
• Contradictions at the Borders
• Sorting out the Sorites
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item