Tolerance and mixed consequence in the S'valuationist setting
From MaRDI portal
Publication:692200
DOI10.1007/S11225-012-9422-YzbMATH Open1260.03058OpenAlexW2115752650MaRDI QIDQ692200FDOQ692200
Authors: Pablo Cobreros, David Ripley, Robert van Rooij, Paul Égré 
Publication date: 4 December 2012
Published in: Studia Logica (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-012-9422-y
Recommendations
Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Logic of natural languages (03B65)
Cites Work
- Tolerant, classical, strict
- A model of tolerance
- Vagueness, truth and logic
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- An introduction to non-classical logic. From if to is
- Sorting out the sorites
- Some supervaluation-based consequence relations
- Contradictions at the borders
- Vagueness, tolerance and non-transitive entailment
- Title not available (Why is that?)
Cited In (14)
- The logics of strict-tolerant logic
- Vagueness: Why do we believe in tolerance?
- Comments on ``Vagueness, tolerance and non-transitive entailment by Robert van Rooij
- Inferential constants
- Foreword: three-valued logics and their applications
- The (Greatest) Fragment of Classical Logic that Respects the Variable-Sharing Principle (in the FMLA-FMLA Framework)
- Metainferential duality
- A hierarchy of classical and paraconsistent logics
- Vagueness, tolerance and non-transitive entailment
- Derivability and metainferential validity
- Pragmatic interpretations of vague expressions: strongest meaning and nonmonotonic consequence
- Meaningless divisions
- Supervaluations and the strict-tolerant hierarchy
- SUSZKO’S PROBLEM: MIXED CONSEQUENCE AND COMPOSITIONALITY
This page was built for publication: Tolerance and mixed consequence in the S'valuationist setting
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q692200)
