Nearly root-n approximation for regression quantile processes

From MaRDI portal
Publication:693744

DOI10.1214/12-AOS1021zbMATH Open1284.62291arXiv1210.1092OpenAlexW2081314317MaRDI QIDQ693744FDOQ693744


Authors: Stephen Portnoy Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 10 December 2012

Published in: The Annals of Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Traditionally, assessing the accuracy of inference based on regression quantiles has relied on the Bahadur representation. This provides an error of order n1/4 in normal approximations, and suggests that inference based on regression quantiles may not be as reliable as that based on other (smoother) approaches, whose errors are generally of order n1/2 (or better in special symmetric cases). Fortunately, extensive simulations and empirical applications show that inference for regression quantiles shares the smaller error rates of other procedures. In fact, the "Hungarian" construction of Koml'{o}s, Major and Tusn'{a}dy [Z. Wahrsch. Verw. Gebiete 32 (1975) 111-131, Z. Wahrsch. Verw. Gebiete 34 (1976) 33-58] provides an alternative expansion for the one-sample quantile process with nearly the root-n error rate (specifically, to within a factor of logn). Such an expansion is developed here to provide a theoretical foundation for more accurate approximations for inference in regression quantile models. One specific application of independent interest is a result establishing that for conditional inference, the error rate for coverage probabilities using the Hall and Sheather [J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 50 (1988) 381-391] method of sparsity estimation matches their one-sample rate.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1210.1092




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (9)

Uses Software





This page was built for publication: Nearly root-\(n\) approximation for regression quantile processes

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q693744)