Assessing the quality of identified models through the asymptotic theory -- when is the result reliable?

DOI10.1016/J.AUTOMATICA.2004.03.005zbMATH Open1073.93013OpenAlexW2140687796MaRDI QIDQ705145FDOQ705145

Authors: Simone Garatti, M. C. Campi, Sergio Bittanti 

Publication date: 26 January 2005

Published in: Automatica (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2004.03.005

Recommendations

• The asymptotic model quality assessment for instrumental variable identification revisited
• Asymptotic criteria for model selection
• Practical identifiability of parametrised models: a review of benefits and limitations of various approaches
• An asymptotic property of model selection criteria
• Asymptotic Properties for a Class of Partially Identified Models
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3938401
• scientific article
• H/sub ∞/ identification and model quality evaluation
• On asymptotic model matching
• An analysis of asymptotic consistency error in a parameter-dependent model problem

zbMATH Keywords

Box-JenkinsSystem identificationAsymptotic theoryARMAXModel quality assessment

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

System identification (93B30) Identification in stochastic control theory (93E12)

Cites Work

• Title not available (Why is that?)
• On covariance function tests used in system identification
• Asymptotic variance expressions for identified black-box transfer function models
• Asymptotic variance expressions for estimated frequency functions
• Identification and control -- Closed-loop issues
• The fundamental role of general orthonormal bases in system identification
• Finite sample properties of system identification methods
• Non-asymptotic confidence ellipsoids for the least-squares estimate
• Quantifying the error in estimated transfer functions with application to model order selection
• Convergence analysis of parametric identification methods
• The role of model validation for assessing the size of the unmodeled dynamics
• Comparing different approaches to model error modeling in robust identification
• Special issue on trends in system identification
• Estimating linear time-invariant models of nonlinear time-varying systems
• Estimation of model quality
• Identification of probabilistic system uncertainty regions by explicit evaluation of bias and variance errors
• Estimating model variance in the case of undermodeling
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Using the bootstrap to estimate the variance in the case of undermodeling

Cited In (20)

• The asymptotic model quality assessment for instrumental variable identification revisited
• Scenario based optimisation over uncertain system identification models
• Identification of symmetric noncausal processes
• Non-asymptotic quality assessment of generalised FIR models with periodic inputs
• Asymptotic statistical analysis for model-based control design strategies
• Identification of multi-input systems: variance analysis and input design issues
• Perturbed datasets methods for hypothesis testing and structure of corresponding confidence sets
• Non-asymptotic confidence regions for the parameters of EIV systems
• Parameter identification for nonlinear systems: guaranteed confidence regions through LSCR
• The nonasymptotic confidence set for parameters of a linear control object under an arbitrary external disturbance
• Bayesian system identification via Markov chain Monte Carlo techniques
• Use Hausdorff metric to analyze convergence of parameter estimation in system identification
• A counterexample to the uniqueness of the asymptotic estimate in ARMAX model identification via the correlation approach
• Non-asymptotic model quality assessment of transfer functions at multiple frequency points
• Non-asymptotic confidence regions for model parameters in the presence of unmodelled dynamics
• Guaranteed non-asymptotic confidence regions in system identification
• Iterative robust control: speeding up improvement through iterations
• On resampling and uncertainty estimation in linear system identification
• Covariance analysis in SISO linear systems identification
• Necessary and sufficient conditions for uniqueness of the minimum in Prediction Error Identification

This page was built for publication: Assessing the quality of identified models through the asymptotic theory -- when is the result reliable?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q705145)