Representing the strengths and directions of pairwise comparisons

DOI10.1016/j.ejor.2003.10.025zbMath1071.90548OpenAlexW1982515566MaRDI QIDQ706886

David B. Hartvigsen

Publication date: 9 February 2005

Published in: European Journal of Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2003.10.025

zbMATH Keywords

Decision analysisPairwise comparisonRatio matrix

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50)

Related Items (8)

Contribution of individual judgments toward inconsistency in pairwise comparisons ⋮ Preference elicitation from inconsistent judgments using multi-objective optimization ⋮ Deriving weights from general pairwise comparison matrices ⋮ A heuristic method to rectify intransitive judgments in pairwise comparison matrices ⋮ Further analysis on matrix operation of AHP ⋮ Detecting and Debugging Erroneous Statements in Pairwise Comparison Matrices ⋮ The mathematical equivalence of the ``spanning tree and row geometric mean preference vectors and its implications for preference analysis ⋮ Enumerating all spanning trees for pairwise comparisons

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• A note on the analysis of subjective judgement matrices
• Consistent weights for judgements matrices on the relative importance of alternatives
• Deriving weights from pairwise comparison ratio matrices: An axiomatic approach
• A multicriteria evaluation of methods for obtaining weights from ratio- scale matrices
• Axiomatic Foundation of the Analytic Hierarchy Process
• Deriving weights from pairwise comparison matrices

This page was built for publication: Representing the strengths and directions of pairwise comparisons