Evaluation of reproducibility for paired functional data
From MaRDI portal
Publication:707397
Recommendations
- A Concordance Correlation Coefficient to Evaluate Reproducibility
- Evaluating Agreement with a Gold Standard in Method Comparison Studies
- A general approach to evaluating agreement between two observers or methods of measurement from quantitative data with replicated measurements
- A Note On "A Concordance Correlation Coefficient to Evaluate Reproducibility"
- Importance of Reproducibility in Responsiveness Issues
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4088796 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3728384 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 469135 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4001209 (Why is no real title available?)
- A Concordance Correlation Coefficient to Evaluate Reproducibility
- A Weighted Concordance Correlation Coefficient for Repeated Measurement Designs
- Assessing Reproducibility by the Within-Subject Coefficient of Variation with Random Effects Models
- Functional data analysis
- Goodness-of-Fit in Generalized Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Models
- Modeling concordance correlation via GEE to evaluate reproducibility
- Statistical Methods in Assessing Agreement
Cited in
(6)- On fitting bivariate functional relationships to unpaired and unequally replicated data
- An angle-based multivariate functional pseudo-depth for shape outlier detection
- Simple moment-based inferences of generalized concordance correlation
- Tolerance bands for functional data
- Functional Regression Analysis of Fluorescence Curves
- Modeling and analysis of functional method comparison data
This page was built for publication: Evaluation of reproducibility for paired functional data
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q707397)