How close is the sample covariance matrix to the actual covariance matrix?

From MaRDI portal
Publication:715740

DOI10.1007/S10959-010-0338-ZzbMATH Open1365.62208arXiv1004.3484OpenAlexW2094644779MaRDI QIDQ715740FDOQ715740


Authors: Roman Vershynin Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 1 November 2012

Published in: Journal of Theoretical Probability (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: Given a probability distribution in R^n with general (non-white) covariance, a classical estimator of the covariance matrix is the sample covariance matrix obtained from a sample of N independent points. What is the optimal sample size N = N(n) that guarantees estimation with a fixed accuracy in the operator norm? Suppose the distribution is supported in a centered Euclidean ball of radius sqrt{n}. We conjecture that the optimal sample size is N = O(n) for all distributions with finite fourth moment, and we prove this up to an iterated logarithmic factor. This problem is motivated by the optimal theorem of Rudelson which states that N = O(n log n) for distributions with finite second moment, and a recent result of Adamczak, Litvak, Pajor and Tomczak-Jaegermann which guarantees that N = O(n) for sub-exponential distributions.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1004.3484




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (57)





This page was built for publication: How close is the sample covariance matrix to the actual covariance matrix?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q715740)