Is there a double-dividend from anti-sprawl policies?

DOI10.1016/J.JEEM.2010.09.002MaRDI QIDQ716265zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Antonio M. Bento, Sofia F. Franco, Daniel T. Kaffine

Publication date 27 April 2011

Published in Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2010.09.002

zbMATH Keywords

spatial modelingsecond best environmental policiesurban sprawl

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Models of societies, social and urban evolution (91D10) Macroeconomic theory (monetary models, models of taxation) (91B64) Environmental economics (natural resource models, harvesting, pollution, etc.) (91B76) Spatial models in economics (91B72)

Recommendations

• Tax deductions, environmental policy, and the double dividend hypothesis
• Double dividend hypothesis, golden rule and welfare distribution
• The influence of public open space on urban spatial structure.
• Ricardian rents, environmental policy and the `double-dividend' hypothesis
• Tax distortions and global climate policy.

Cites work

• Environmental amenities, urban sprawl, and community characteristics
• Environmental tax interactions when pollution affects health or productivity
• Pollution taxes and revenue recycling
• Ricardian rents, environmental policy and the `double-dividend' hypothesis
• Tax deductions, environmental policy, and the double dividend hypothesis
• The influence of public open space on urban spatial structure.

Cited in

(1)

• The influence of public open space on urban spatial structure.

This page was built for publication: Is there a double-dividend from anti-sprawl policies?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q716265)