All agreed: Aumann meets DeGroot

DOI10.1007/S11238-017-9633-9MaRDI QIDQ721179zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors Jan-Willem Romeijn, Olivier Roy

Publication date 18 July 2018

Published in Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)

Copyright license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-017-9633-9

zbMATH Keywords

social epistemologydynamic agreement theoremiterated pooling

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06)

Recommendations

• On reaching a consensus using DeGroot's iterative pooling
• Common knowledge, communication, and convergence of beliefs
• Communication, consensus, and knowledge
• Consensus and common knowledge of an aggregate of decisions
• Compatibilidad del método de De Groot para llegar a un consenso con la fórmula de Bayes

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3737329 (Why is no real title available?)
• Agreeing to disagree
• Modeling expert judgements for Bayesian updating
• Reaching a Consensus
• Social and economic networks.
• Testimony as evidence: more problems for linear pooling
• The Opinion Pool
• We can't disagree forever
• Weighted averaging, Jeffrey conditioning and invariance

Cited in

(7)

• A cyclic representation of discrete coordination procedures
• Learning from others: conditioning versus averaging
• On a diversity of perspectives and world views: learning under Bayesian vis-á-vis DeGroot updating
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2088845 (Why is no real title available?)
• SUPPORT FOR GEOMETRIC POOLING
• Collective opinion as tendency towards consensus
• Sanov meets Cramér again

This page was built for publication: All agreed: Aumann meets DeGroot

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q721179)