A labelling framework for probabilistic argumentation

From MaRDI portal
Publication:722102

DOI10.1007/S10472-018-9574-1zbMATH Open1459.68197arXiv1708.00109OpenAlexW2741916207WikidataQ130108178 ScholiaQ130108178MaRDI QIDQ722102FDOQ722102

Pietro Baroni, Yang Gao, Antonino Rotolo, Guido Governatori, Giovanni Sartor, Rรฉgis Riveret

Publication date: 20 July 2018

Published in: Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: The combination of argumentation and probability paves the way to new accounts of qualitative and quantitative uncertainty, thereby offering new theoretical and applicative opportunities. Due to a variety of interests, probabilistic argumentation is approached in the literature with different frameworks, pertaining to structured and abstract argumentation, and with respect to diverse types of uncertainty, in particular the uncertainty on the credibility of the premises, the uncertainty about which arguments to consider, and the uncertainty on the acceptance status of arguments or statements. Towards a general framework for probabilistic argumentation, we investigate a labelling-oriented framework encompassing a basic setting for rule-based argumentation and its (semi-) abstract account, along with diverse types of uncertainty. Our framework provides a systematic treatment of various kinds of uncertainty and of their relationships and allows us to back or question assertions from the literature.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1708.00109





Cites Work


Cited In (6)

Uses Software


Recommendations





This page was built for publication: A labelling framework for probabilistic argumentation

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q722102)