On the relationship between modular and hypergeometric functions

DOI10.1134/S0012266109020013MaRDI QIDQ731608zbMATHOpenAlexFDO

Authors S. M. Artemeva, Hans-Wilhelm Burmann

Publication date 8 October 2009

Published in Differential Equations (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1134/s0012266109020013

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Classical hypergeometric functions, ({}_2F_1) (33C05) Dedekind eta function, Dedekind sums (11F20) Quadratic extensions (11R11) Automorphic forms, one variable (11F12)

Recommendations

• On the relationship between hypergeometric functions and some multivalued functions
• Classical automorphic forms and hypergeometric functions
• Transformation relations of matrix functions associated to the hypergeometric function of Gauss under modular transformations
• Theta-function identities and the explicit formulas for theta-function and their applications
• Hypergeometric transformation formulas of degrees 3, 7, 11 and 23

Cited in

(5)

• Classical automorphic forms and hypergeometric functions
• Exponential integral representations of theta functions
• On the relationship between hypergeometric functions and some multivalued functions
• Transformation relations of matrix functions associated to the hypergeometric function of Gauss under modular transformations
• Hypergeometric Functions, My Love

This page was built for publication: On the relationship between modular and hypergeometric functions

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q731608)