Methods for distance-based judgment aggregation
From MaRDI portal
Publication:733803
DOI10.1007/s00355-008-0340-xzbMath1180.91114OpenAlexW2022396335MaRDI QIDQ733803
Michael K. Miller, Daniel N. Osherson
Publication date: 19 October 2009
Published in: Social Choice and Welfare (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-008-0340-x
Related Items
The logic of group decisions: judgment aggregation ⋮ Introduction to Judgment Aggregation ⋮ The median rule in judgement aggregation ⋮ Local supermajorities ⋮ A partial taxonomy of judgment aggregation rules and their properties ⋮ Judgment aggregation and the problem of tracking the truth ⋮ Complexity of control in judgment aggregation for uniform premise-based quota rules ⋮ The doctrinal paradox, the discursive dilemma, and logical aggregation theory ⋮ Distance rationalization of voting rules ⋮ Scoring rules for judgment aggregation ⋮ Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others ⋮ Complexity of manipulation and bribery in judgment aggregation for uniform premise-based quota rules ⋮ Unnamed Item ⋮ Aggregating with reason(s) ⋮ Neutrality and relative acceptability in judgment aggregation ⋮ A measure of distance between judgment sets ⋮ Propositionwise judgment aggregation: the general case ⋮ Voting rules as statistical estimators ⋮ The Complexity Landscape of Outcome Determination in Judgment Aggregation ⋮ Acceptance, aggregation and scoring rules ⋮ Judgment aggregation in nonmonotonic logic ⋮ Graph aggregation ⋮ Introduction to judgment aggregation ⋮ Judgment aggregation and minimal change: a model of consensus formation by belief revision ⋮ Judgment aggregation and agenda manipulation
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Aggregating sets of judgments: two impossibility results compared. With a comment by Isaac Levi
- The probability of inconsistencies in complex collective decisions
- \(\text{DA}^2\) merging operators
- Logical constraints on judgement aggregation
- Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: an argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation
- Judgment aggregation without full rationality
- Consistent judgement aggregation: the truth-functional case
- Factoring out the impossibility of logical aggregation
- Aggregation of binary evaluations
- Disjunctive merging: quota and Gmin merging operators
- The structure of strategy-proof social choice. I: General characterization and possibility results on median spaces
- The Dodgson ranking and its relation to Kemeny's method and Slater's rule
- A comparison of some distance-based choice rules in ranking environments
- Arrow's theorem as a corollary
- A geometric examination of Kemeny's rule
- A distance measure for choice functions
- Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation
- Which worlds are possible? A judgment aggregation problem
- Judgment aggregation: (im)possibility theorems
- Democratic answers to complex questions -- an epistemic perspective
- Borda and condorcet: Some distance results
- A generalised model of judgment aggregation
- Belief base merging as a game
- Preference Proximity and Anonymous Social Choice
- Condorcet Social Choice Functions
- A Consistent Extension of Condorcet’s Election Principle
- Merging Information Under Constraints: A Logical Framework
- A Set of Independent Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Simple Majority Decision
