Selecting among multi-mode partitioning models of different complexities: a comparison of four model selection criteria
From MaRDI portal
Publication:734363
DOI10.1007/s00357-008-9005-9zbMath1260.62048OpenAlexW2052173702MaRDI QIDQ734363
Jan Schepers, Eva Ceulemans, Iven van Mechelen
Publication date: 13 October 2009
Published in: Journal of Classification (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00357-008-9005-9
Lua error in Module:PublicationMSCList at line 37: attempt to index local 'msc_result' (a nil value).
Related Items (13)
Optimization strategies for two-mode partitioning ⋮ Maximal interaction two-mode clustering ⋮ Additive biclustering: a comparison of one new and two existing ALS algorithms ⋮ A systematic study into the factors that affect the predictive accuracy of multilevel VAR(1) models ⋮ ROOTCLUS: searching for ``ROOT clusters in three-way proximity data ⋮ REMAXINT: a two-mode clustering-based method for statistical inference on two-way interaction ⋮ Factorial and reduced \(K\)-means reconsidered ⋮ CLASSI: A classification model for the study of sequential processes and individual differences therein ⋮ Model selection for Gaussian latent block clustering with the integrated classification likelihood ⋮ An exact algorithm for the two-mode \(KL\)-means partitioning problem ⋮ Robust double clustering: a method based on alternating concentration steps ⋮ The real-valued model of hierarchical classes ⋮ Lowdimensional additive overlapping clustering
Cites Work
- Estimating the Number of Clusters in a Data Set Via the Gap Statistic
- Optimization strategies for two-mode partitioning
- Three-mode partitioning
- Two-mode multi-partitioning
- Hierarchical classes models for three-way three-mode binary data: interrelations and model selection
- Finding the Number of Clusters in a Dataset
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
This page was built for publication: Selecting among multi-mode partitioning models of different complexities: a comparison of four model selection criteria