A model of Cummings and Foreman revisited
From MaRDI portal
Publication:741086
DOI10.1016/J.APAL.2014.07.002zbMATH Open1353.03063OpenAlexW2004159708MaRDI QIDQ741086FDOQ741086
Authors: Spencer Unger 
Publication date: 10 September 2014
Published in: Annals of Pure and Applied Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apal.2014.07.002
Recommendations
Other combinatorial set theory (03E05) Consistency and independence results (03E35) Large cardinals (03E55) Ordered sets and their cofinalities; pcf theory (03E04)
Cites Work
- The fine structure of the constructible hierarchy
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Some Independence Results on Reflection
- Making the supercompactness of \(\nu\) indestructible under \(\nu\)-directed closed forcing
- Squares, scales and stationary reflection
- Reflecting stationary sets and successors of singular cardinals
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Reflecting stationary sets
- Notes on singular cardinal combinatorics
- The tree property
- Aronszajn trees and the successors of a singular cardinal
- Aronszajn trees and the independence of the transfer property
- Combinatorial Characterization of Supercompact Cardinals
- The tree property up to \(\aleph_{\omega+1}\)
- Strong tree properties for small cardinals
Cited In (8)
- The ineffable tree property and failure of the singular cardinals hypothesis
- Guessing models and the approachability ideal
- ITP, ISP, AND SCH
- Strong tree properties for small cardinals
- The strong tree property and weak square
- The strong tree property and the failure of SCH
- The strong and super tree properties at successors of singular cardinals
- The super tree property at the successor of a singular
This page was built for publication: A model of Cummings and Foreman revisited
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q741086)
