Cyclical growth in a Goodwin-Kalecki-Marx model
From MaRDI portal
Publication:741564
DOI10.1007/s00712-012-0278-4zbMath1294.91123MaRDI QIDQ741564
Publication date: 12 September 2014
Published in: Journal of Economics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-012-0278-4
Related Items
Cyclical growth in a Goodwin-Kalecki-Marx model, Inflation-deflation expectations and economic stability in a Kaleckian system, Unemployment, income distribution and debt-financed investment in a growth cycle model, Growth and cycles as a struggle: Lotka-Volterra, Goodwin and Phillips, Testing a Goodwin's model with capacity utilization to the US economy, A non-linear Keynesian Goodwin-type endogenous model of the cycle: Bayesian evidence for the USA
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Cyclical growth in a Goodwin-Kalecki-Marx model
- On the optimality of limit cycles in dynamic economic systems
- The Hopf bifurcation and the existence and stability of closed orbits in multisector models of optimal economic growth
- Dynamic complexity in a Keynesian growth-cycle model involving Harrod's instability
- A Kolmogoroff generalized predator-prey model of Goodwin's growth cycle
- Endogenous growth cycles
- Limits to investment exhilarationism
- THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL SHORTCOMINGS OF THE KALECKIAN INVESTMENT FUNCTION
- Marx-Goodwin growth cycles in a two-sector economy
- STEINDLIAN MODELS OF GROWTH AND STAGNATION
- DISTRIBUTIVE AND DEMAND CYCLES IN THE US ECONOMY?A STRUCTURALIST GOODWIN MODEL
- A GOODWINIAN MODEL WITH DIRECT AND ROUNDABOUT RETURNS TO SCALE (AN APPLICATION TO ITALY)
- Effective Demand, Class Struggle and Cyclical Growth
- Stable, cyclic and chaotic growth: The dynamics of a discrete-time version of Goodwin's growth cycle model
- Fiscal policy and the classical growth cycle
- A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction
- ENDOGENOUS TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION, CAPITAL ACCUMULATION AND DISTRIBUTIONAL DYNAMICS
- DO RISING REAL WAGES INCREASE THE RATE OF LABOR-SAVING TECHNICAL CHANGE? SOME ECONOMETRIC EVIDENCE