The evolution of complexity in social organization -- A model using dominance-subordinate behavior in two social wasp species
From MaRDI portal
Publication:745043
DOI10.1016/J.JTBI.2013.01.010zbMATH Open1322.92088arXiv1403.6074OpenAlexW2079297146WikidataQ43871048 ScholiaQ43871048MaRDI QIDQ745043FDOQ745043
Authors: Anjan K. Nandi, Anindita Bhadra, Annagiri Sumana, S. A. Deshpande, Raghavendra Gadagkar 
Publication date: 13 October 2015
Published in: Journal of Theoretical Biology (Search for Journal in Brave)
Abstract: Dominance and subordinate behaviours are important ingredients in the social organizations of group living animals. Behavioural observations on the two eusocial species extit{Ropalidia marginata} and extit{Ropalidia cyathiformis} suggest varying complexities in their social systems. The queen of R. cyathiformis is an aggressive individual who usually holds the top position in the dominance hierarchy although she does not necessarily show the maximum number of acts of dominance, while the R. marginata queen rarely shows aggression and usually does not hold the top position in the dominance hierarchy of her colony. These differences are reflected in the distribution of dominance-subordinate interactions among the hierarchically ranked individuals in both the species. The percentage of dominance interactions decrease gradually with hierarchical ranks in R. marginata while in R. cyathiformis it first increases and then decreases. We use an agent-based model to investigate the underlying mechanism that could give rise to the observed patterns for both the species. The model assumes, besides some non-interacting individuals, that the interaction probabilities of the agents depend on their pre-differentiated winning abilities. Our simulations show that if the queen takes up a strategy of being involved in a moderate number of dominance interactions, one could get the pattern similar to R. cyathiformis, while taking up the strategy of very low interactions by the queen could lead to the pattern of R. marginata. We infer that both the species follow a common interaction pattern, while the differences in their social organization are due to the slight changes in queen as well as worker strategies. These changes in strategies are expected to accompany the evolution of more complex societies from simpler ones.
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1403.6074
Recommendations
- Dominance orders in animal societies: the self-organization hypothesis revisited
- On the Distribution of Dominance in Populations of Social Organisms
- Mathematical model of self-organizing hierarchies in animal societies
- Behavioural interactions selecting for symmetry and asymmetry in sexual reproductive systems of eusocial species
- Finding optimal collective strategies using individual-based simulations: colony organization in social insects
Cites Work
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- On the Distribution of Dominance in Populations of Social Organisms
- Dominance orders in animal societies: the self-organization hypothesis revisited
- Mathematical model of self-organizing hierarchies in animal societies
- How do workers of the primitively eusocial wasp \textit{Ropalidia marginata} detect the presence of their queens?
Cited In (2)
Uses Software
This page was built for publication: The evolution of complexity in social organization -- A model using dominance-subordinate behavior in two social wasp species
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q745043)
