Comparison of stopped Cox regression with direct methods such as pseudo-values and binomial regression
From MaRDI portal
Publication:747354
DOI10.1007/s10985-014-9299-3zbMath1322.62298OpenAlexW1983651680WikidataQ38236091 ScholiaQ38236091MaRDI QIDQ747354
Hans C. van Houwelingen, Hein Putter
Publication date: 16 October 2015
Published in: Lifetime Data Analysis (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10985-014-9299-3
pseudo-observationsproportional hazards regressiondirect binomial regressionlandmarkingstopped Cox regression
Lua error in Module:PublicationMSCList at line 37: attempt to index local 'msc_result' (a nil value).
Related Items (3)
Estimating the average treatment effect on survival based on observational data and using partly conditional modeling ⋮ Modeling restricted mean survival time under general censoring mechanisms ⋮ Testing for center effects on survival and competing risks outcomes using pseudo-value regression
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Pseudo-observations for competing risks with covariate dependent censoring
- On pseudo-values for regression analysis in competing risks models
- Generalised linear models for correlated pseudo-observations, with applications to multi-state models
- Direct Modelling of Regression Effects for Transition Probabilities in Multistate Models
- Dynamic Prediction by Landmarking in Event History Analysis
This page was built for publication: Comparison of stopped Cox regression with direct methods such as pseudo-values and binomial regression
