A belief revision approach for argumentation-based negotiation agents
From MaRDI portal
Publication:747516
DOI10.1515/AMCS-2015-0034zbMATH Open1322.93006OpenAlexW2406068538MaRDI QIDQ747516FDOQ747516
Authors: Pablo Pilotti, Ana Casali, Carlos Iván Chesñevar 
Publication date: 16 October 2015
Published in: International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/amcs-2015-0034
Recommendations
Cites Work
- On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
- A textbook of belief dynamics. Theory change and database updating
- On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions
- Kernel contraction
- Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation
- A General Framework for Argumentation-Based Negotiation
- Multiple kernel contraction
- A logic-based axiomatic model of bargaining
- Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing
- On the Benefits of Exploiting Hierarchical Goals in Bilateral Automated Negotiation
Cited In (11)
- Negotiation and defeasible decision making
- Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
- Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
- How Agents Alter Their Beliefs After an Argumentation-Based Dialogue
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Progress in Artificial Intelligence
- Argument-Based Decision Making and Negotiation in E-Business: Contracting a Land Lease for a Computer Assembly Plant
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Belief change and argumentation in multi-agent scenarios
Uses Software
This page was built for publication: A belief revision approach for argumentation-based negotiation agents
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q747516)
