Intensional vs extensional probabilities from their origins to Laplace
This is a study of an anonymous paper ``Calculation of the credibility of human testimony (1699) and its comparison with the relevant considerations of J. Bernoulli (with his ``pure and ``mixed arguments) and Laplace. The authors conclude that the 17th-century notion of degree of certitude measures the correctness of the ``internal state of the witness. They do not explain the meaning of the adjectives used in the title of their article, while commenting on the contribution of J. Craig (1699) they fail to mention S. Stigler's recent interpretation of his mathematics.
- An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. By the late Rev. Mr. Bayes, F. R. S. communicated by Mr. Price, in a letter to John Canton, A. M. F. R. S.
- Combined Evidence
- Giochi, scommesse sulla vita, tabelle di mortalita: Nascita del calcolo probabilistico, statistica e teoria delle popolazioni
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3685433 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3783731 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3485699 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3509480 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3560492 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3196588 (Why is no real title available?)
- Rileggendo Bernoulli
This page was built for publication: Intensional vs extensional probabilities from their origins to Laplace
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q752672)