Classifying 3-dimensional lens spaces by eta-invariants
Let p be a positive integer and q an integer relatively prime to p. There exist examples which show that the eta invariants \(\eta(p,q)\) of the three dimensional lens spaces \(L(p,q)\) are not complete isometric invariants. In the present paper the author studies the eta invariants \(\eta_{\alpha}(p,q)\) of \(L(p,q)\) which correspond to an irreducible representation \(\alpha\) of the fundamental group \(\pi_ 1(L(p,q))\cong {\mathbb{Z}}/p{\mathbb{Z}}\). He proves that two 3-dimensional lens spaces \(L(p,q)\) and \(L(p,\bar q)\) are isometric to each other if and only if some of their eta invariants corresponding to a representation of the fundamental group satisfy a certain set of equations. The proof uses the representation of \(\eta_{\alpha}(p,q)\) by a generalized Dedekind sum.
- The eta invariant and K0 of lens spaces
- On the value of Dedekind sums and eta-invariants for 3-dimensional lens spaces
- Le calcul des invariants \theta_p des espaces lenticulaires
- Which lens spaces are distinguished by Turaev-Viro invariants
- Distinguishing Three-Dimensional Lens Spaces L(7, 1) and L(7, 2) by Means of Classical Pentagon Equation
- The eta invariant and K0 of lens spaces
- On the value of Dedekind sums and eta-invariants for 3-dimensional lens spaces
- Theta invariants of lens spaces via the BV-BFV formalism
- Distinguishing Three-Dimensional Lens Spaces L(7, 1) and L(7, 2) by Means of Classical Pentagon Equation
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7604689 (Why is no real title available?)
- Modular factorization of superconformal indices
This page was built for publication: Classifying 3-dimensional lens spaces by eta-invariants
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q753206)