Negative refraction and positive refraction are not Lorentz covariant
From MaRDI portal
Publication:763778
DOI10.1016/J.PHYSLETA.2009.10.042zbMATH Open1235.78007arXiv0907.5278OpenAlexW3149688892MaRDI QIDQ763778FDOQ763778
Authors: Tom G. Mackay, Akhlesh Lakhtakia
Publication date: 2 April 2012
Published in: Physics Letters. A (Search for Journal in Brave)
Abstract: The refraction of linearly polarized plane waves into a half-space occupied by a material moving at constant velocity was studied by directly implementing the Lorentz transformations of electric and magnetic fields. From the perspective of a co-moving observer, the moving material was a spatially local, pseudochiral omega material. Numerical studies revealed that whether or not negative refraction occurrs in the moving material depends upon the speed of movement as well as the angle of incidence and the polarization state of the incident plane wave. Furthermore, the phenomenons of negative phase velocity and counterposition in the moving material were similarly found not to be Lorentz covariant; both phenomenons were also found to be sensitive to the angle of incidence and the polarization state of the incident plane wave.
Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/0907.5278
Recommendations
- Counterposition and negative phase velocity in uniformly moving dissipative materials
- Electromagnetic wave propagation in a moving chiral medium
- Topical review. What is negative refraction?
- On negative refraction in classical vacuum
- Author's reply to ‘Response to “On negative refraction in classical vacuum” ’
Electromagnetic theory (general) (78A25) Waves and radiation in optics and electromagnetic theory (78A40) Special relativity (83A05) Physical optics (78A10)
Cites Work
Cited In (4)
This page was built for publication: Negative refraction and positive refraction are not Lorentz covariant
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q763778)