Relationships between p-values and Pearson correlation coefficients, type 1 errors and effect size errors, under a true null hypothesis
DOI10.1007/S42519-020-00115-6zbMATH Open1436.62023OpenAlexW3037784022MaRDI QIDQ777863FDOQ777863
Authors: Eugene Komaroff 
Publication date: 7 July 2020
Published in: Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42519-020-00115-6
Recommendations
- Time to dispense with the \(p\)-value in OR? Rationale and implications of the statement of the American Statistical Association (ASA) on \(p\)-values
- Significance test for linear regression: how to test without \(P\)-values?
- Theoretical and empirical distributions of the \(p\) value
- The widespread misinterpretation of \(p\)-values as error probabilities
- The \(p\)-value case, a review of the debate: issues and plausible remedies
\(p\)-valueseffect sizePearson correlation coefficientstatistical significanceFisher \(r\) to \(z\) transformationsubstantive significance
Foundations and philosophical topics in statistics (62A01) Introductory exposition (textbooks, tutorial papers, etc.) pertaining to statistics (62-01)
Cites Work
- The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- THE PROBABLE ERROR OF A MEAN
- R. A. Fisher in the 21st century. Invited paper presented at the 1996 R. A. Fisher lecture. (With comments).
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- The improbability principle. Why coincidences, miracles, and rare events happen every day
- Moving to a World Beyond “p < 0.05”
- Abandon Statistical Significance
Cited In (2)
Uses Software
This page was built for publication: Relationships between \(p\)-values and Pearson correlation coefficients, type 1 errors and effect size errors, under a true null hypothesis
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q777863)
